At the start of her essay, Speaking in Tongues, Zadie Smith examines her experiences of going to college and changing the way she spoke. She says, "at home, during the holidays, I spoke with my old voice, and in the old voice seemed to feel and speak things that I couldn't express in college, and vise vera. I felt a sort of wonder at the flexibility of the thing. Like being alive twice." (180). Why does society place such a pressure on blending in and forming to the supposed mold? Why do we feel such shame in being different?
In that opening, she takes full advantage of the word, voice. In the first three paragraphs the words is used nearly 10 times. What is the significance of this word? Why does she repeat it so many times?
Smith talks about Eliza Doolittle and her father both becoming stuck between two types of people. "By the time the curtain goes down, both Doolittles find themselves stuck in the middle, which is, to Shaw, a comi-tragic place to be, with the emphasis on the tragic. What are they fit for? What will become of them?" (181). Why do Shaw and Smith find such horror in being stuck in the middle? Is it perhaps a result of Smith's experiences in the middle?
Throughout the second portion of her essay, Smith talks a lot about Obama and his multi-voiced campaign. She even questions whether this is good and trustworthy for a president to have the ability to hide behind so many voices. Does she make a point here? Is she right?
She also goes on to briefly examine ways in which racism still is prevalent for blacks (188-189). She seems to say that there are many types of black people. Why does she even include this section? It does not support her argument of many voices and biracial identity. It seems rather to create separation between people of one race.
On the last pages of her text, Smith tells the story of being afraid of traveling to Harlem the night of Obama's election because she was too different. Is this anecdote effective in making her entire argument more tangible and relatable? Does it serve its purpose - making us take another look at what she was trying to prove?